Edit with
With vs. Without thermal AWG — atmospheric water generation from waste heat
300°C
1100 MW
$15/ton
AWG Production
20561K
gallons/day
Demand Coverage
257%
of 8.0M GPD
Avoided Emissions
48857
tons CO₂/yr
Credit Revenue
$733K
per year
WITHOUT SciFiBot
BaselineWITH SciFiBot
Thermal AWGCarbon Credit Opportunity
Avoided Emissions
48857 tCO₂e/yr
Credit Revenue
$733K /yr
Emission Reduction
96%
Payback
1.3 yrs
Facility Profile
Economics
ANALYSIS
Switching to SciFiBot thermal AWG avoids 48857 tons CO₂/year — equivalent to 1954 acres of forest sequestration. At $15/ton, that's $733K/year in verifiable carbon credits, issued under VCS or Gold Standard methodology. Full water demand coverage with surplus for sale.
THE SCIENCE: Standard AWG uses 250–400 kWh/m³ (expensive). Thermal AWG with waste heat uses 40–80 kWh/m³ equivalent — because the heat is already paid for. Higher temperature waste heat = better desiccant regeneration = more water per unit energy = more avoided grid emissions = more carbon credits.